paul roger moore colusa ca

Peter tried to convince his grandmother Mimi to disinherit his father, confident that his Uncle Roger would be more fair. Instead, he agreed that the saying, Don't let your bulldog mouth let your mockingbird ass get in trouble applied to Peter. 107 5th Street, Colusa, CA 95932 I am military trained. A document examiner expert testified at trial that the paper used in the second letter sent to the sheriff, the diagram, and the indented paper were chemically indistinguishable. Paul concedes that the standard of review is an abuse of discretion, but he cautions us not to rely on the colorful descriptions and derisive boilerplates the Attorney General uses to describe abuse of discretion, including such catchphrases as a court abuses its discretion when the ruling is arbitrary, capricious, or patently absurd, resulting in a manifest miscarriage of justice. Rather, he insists the ultimate question is whether the court's ruling was unreasonable in light of the governing law and the facts presented. This information was not disclosed to the public. He could not retrieve his father's cell phone because his father was on fire. David Moore's birthday is 01/17/1944 and is 78 years old. Contact us. I have nothing to say to that man, other than bye-bye.". By Harold Kruger Whether or not there is some authority to support the questionable proposition that a prosecutor's rebuttal is limited by the scope of the facts and evidence argued in the defendant's closing argument, the prosecutor did not introduce evidence outside the record or float a completely new theory of guilt. Roberto's seven-year-old son told the investigators and testified at the preliminary hearing that he did not move or drive the truck after the bomb exploded. The letter read: I am responsible for the panel explosion. Paul's narrative of family intrigue has all the earmarks of a Shakespearean tragedy and makes for compelling drama. Your IP: Believe me and have time to do something to help these guys.. We concur with the trial court's analysis that [t]his comment can, in the context of a case where the prosecution presented dozens of witnesses over several weeks, only fairly be understood as a comment that witnesses can be called by either side. He has endangered others in his family. The target is brother of target one and drives Chevy. Paul Moore was convicted of killing Roberto Ayala, an employee of Moore Brothers. The forensic evidence, including the indented sheet of paper with Paul's fingerprints on it, the ink and paper from his printer matching the ink and paper mailed to the sheriff, the matching fishing lines, and the presence in the farm shop of many of the materials needed to make the bomb, constitutes substantial evidence to support the inference the jury made that it was Paul who wrote the letters to the sheriff, and it was therefore Paul who planted the bomb that blew up Roberto Ayala, just as he had planned. They found threaded pipe nipple, end caps in the form of reducers and plugs, other end caps, washers, nuts, multicolored wire, and seven-inch bolts. He also noted that the second letter, bomb diagram, and indented sheet of paper had comparable levels of sodium, sulfur, and chlorine. Paul Moore, a family friend of Ayalas, was found guilty of setting the explosive device that killed Ayala after he turned on an irrigation pump at a rice field at the Moore Brothers farm. Medicare vs. Medicare Advantage. His reputation in the community would make Peter the more likely suspect than Paul. Thus, he was suggesting by analogy that the document examiner could not say the papers were a positive match. The trial court rejected the defense claim that the prosecutor improperly had compared paper stock analysis to DNA analysis when there was no DNA analysis in evidence. Roger encouraged Roberto to seek a restraining order against Peter, but Roberto declined. He insisted that Peter planted the indented paper and that his fingerprints were left on the top sheet when he placed his hand on it to adjust a window shade. A state appeals court this week upheld Paul Moore's murder conviction. He opined that the second letter and bomb diagram had the same physical, optical, and chemical profiles. The next day, the investigators at the Colusa County Sheriff's Department received a letter with a postmark from Sacramento that they learned was processed by the postal service in West Sacramento. The wiretapping incident indicates knowledge of electrical circuits, as well as the ability to alter and manipulate said circuits while maintaining personal safety. In the second message, Peter said he had worked for 21 years so he could have a chance to farm; that he wanted his grandfather's farm to stay in the family, but his father had disinherited him; that he and Roger were now screwed and he was not going to get a chance to farm; that he had never had a father except biologically; that his father was a douchebag and had never given him a penny; that Roger could not see the Ayala boys over there ripping [him] off blind; and that Roberto had his kid driving the harvester. In fact, the incarcerated mans full name is Paul Roger Moore, as a sign of respect to his father. ARLAN MOORE OBITUARY . A Sacramento County jury found him guilty on Aug. 23. Paul told the investigators that Peter had been around the explosion site one day before the explosion. The writing is comprised in a similar fashion as the letters themselves. In sum, there is an abundance of circumstantial evidence that either Peter or Paul, or perhaps Peter and Paul together, built and planted the bomb that killed Roberto Ayala. "Do I think Paul did this? The Legislature therefore has declared that evidence of a person's character or a trait of his or her character (whether in the form of an opinion, evidence of reputation, or evidence of specific instances of his or her conduct) is inadmissible when offered to prove his or her conduct on a specified occasion. (Evid. While it might sound like a humble title, Roger is seemingly quite well off. He also testified that Paul and a friend created an acetylene bomb by combining acetylene gas and oxygen in a balloon. There is no direct evidence that Peter knew Roberto's precise work schedule or routine, but a jury could reasonably infer that he understood that a foreman's responsibility included adjusting the water levels on the rice fields. The trial court cannot be said to have abused its discretion by admitting highly relevant evidence when the only prejudice is the fact the story Paul himself told was a damaging one. Rainfall near a quarter of an inch. On August 18 Paul brought in another fragment he thought was suspicious and indicative of a bomb going off. Paul insists it was his first cousin Peter who had the motive and violent disposition to murder Roberto, a man who had claimed his father's and uncle's affection and devotion. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. There were talks of Moore being reappointed to supervise the Sacramento River Fire Protection District, from November 16, 2019, to November 15, 2023. I'm going to get that F'er. Peter testified that Paul was severely depressed and he was afraid he was suicidal. November: By November the investigation had targeted Paul. First, he complains the prosecutors sandbagged him by engaging one prosecutor, who played a more minor role at trial, to make a perfunctory opening argument, saving its genuine substantive attack by the prosecutor who conducted the bulk of the examination. We accept for purposes of this issue the trial court's characterization of the defense closing argument. CR53504) There was no undue consumption of time since Paul's ex-father-in-law explained what he knew about Paul's involvement in creating an explosion in a paragraph or two. Rogers exact whereabouts as of 2020 remain unknown. Roberto was not an impediment to his ambitions. In The Court of Appeal of the State of California. But it is the jury's prerogative, not ours, to weigh the evidence. Burial service, Funeral service, Memorial service, Cremation, Special service for veterans, Pre-arrangements, Grief support, Caskets & Vaults & Urns and more products . God [sic] luck. "We've waited 25 months and seven days for this moment," said Eduardo Ayala, brother of the victim. He also threatened his Uncle Roger, despite the fact he believed Roger would be more fair to him than his father. Most damning, they found a sheet of paper with indentations that appeared to match the diagram of the bomb sent to the sheriff. Titled Family Business, the episode shows how the murder took place against the backdrop of the Moore family saga. The circumstantial evidence against Paul Moore included opportunity to plant the bomb and familiarity with the farms, a unique skill set to fix electrical and pump problems, and Pauls bringing investigators a piece of metal he found near the explosion. To be sure, Paul had demonstrated an advanced mechanical aptitude and an understanding of electrical currents. In 2019, the board of supervisors of Colusa met. The prosecution need not, as we know, prove motive. During tomato harvest, he wrote, he drove the shitty tractor, but pussy Peter was allowed to drive the tractor with an air-conditioned cab because otherwise Peter was a prick to work with. Employees, including Roberto Ayala and Roberto's brother Eduardo, were given liberties he was not, such as drinking on the job, taking farm vehicles and equipment for personal use, and getting paid during the winter. Beyond the substance of the arguments, Paul contends the prosecutors sandbagged him by withholding the most powerful evidence until rebuttal and depriving him of the opportunity to answer that evidence. There were pieces of metal shrapnel in his chest, neck, and brain. Low 41F. SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Paul Moore was convicted in state court announced Colusa County District Attorney John R. Poyner, Colusa County Sheriff Scott D. Marshall, and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), San Francisco Field Division Special Agent in Charge Joseph M. Riehl. She also testified the labels on the envelopes sent to the sheriff were consistent with those on Paul's file folders, with the same type of polyester backing and the same type of acrylic-based adhesive. Both suffered physically. Periods of rain. It is speculative, according to Paul, to assume that wiretapping a telephone is any more complicated than purchasing a Radio Shack or Spy Store device complete with user instructions for dummies [or] a DIY device.. In the explosive expert's opinion, the evidence collected from the scene of the explosion was consistent with the diagram of the bomb, including a bolt with the piece of fishing line, pieces of a sprayed-black plastic bottle, plastic wrap, and washers and bolts that might have been part of the bomb. Similarly, when Roberto and Paul disagreed about a design for a mud chisel, Roberto's idea garnered Roger's blessing. Paul Moore is the son of Roger Moore, who co-owns the 1,800 acre family farm with his brother, Gus Moore. He dropped his clippings from his landscape business 40 yards from the pump. "Paul was afforded a fair. But the document provided strong circumstantial evidence he secretly envied the position to which Roberto had ascended and the discomfort Roberto's presence continued to cause him. Whether we conclude that despite our reservation the trial court did not abuse its discretion or that, even if there was an abuse of discretion, the failure to allow surrebuttal was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, our rationale is essentially the same. On appeal, Paul challenges the court's denial of her request. The actual printing on the diagram looks like somebody printed it on a label maker, affixed it to the paper and then ran it through a photocopier. Code, 1101, subd. He contends the evidence was too remote, was not probative of his knowledge of electrical circuitry or constructing sophisticated bombs, and was substantially more prejudicial than probative. The fact that the prosecutor chose to highlight the damaging evidence only in response to the defense claims that Peter, not Paul, had killed Roberto Ayala and that he had no motive or nothing to gain from the killing was a strategic choice the prosecutors made. Having reviewed the evidence offered by the prosecution, we now turn to the evidence presented by the defense that Peter, not Paul, planted the bomb that killed Roberto Ayala, for he too appeared to disdain the man, he too had the opportunity and familiarity with the irrigation pump, he too had access to the area in which the bomb was planted, and he too had incriminating evidence on his computer hard drive. Whether a trial court has erred in admitting evidence under Evidence Code section 1101 is also reviewed for an abuse of discretion. While Peter and Paul have very different dispositions, they share similar grievances and similar life trajectories. This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. In addition, he had a violent disposition and leveled threats to harm not only Roberto, but his father, his uncle, and many others who upset him. Paul alleges the trial court erred by denying his request to offer a surrebuttal to the second prosecutor's rebuttal and depriving him of the opportunity to offer a reply to the facts and arguments he had not raised in his own closing argument. Virginia Carmen Ortiz. Their investigation focused on whether the explosion was an accident. But Peter's situation was far different. This vehicle info is the same as the first job. Trig one, vibration activated. In early July, Paul was asked to drive out to the rice field to turn on the water pump without Roberto. Because the My Life document was highly probative, it is not surprising or improper that the prosecutor quoted it in the opening of his rebuttal argument. A forensic document examiner compared the sheet of paper with the indentations that had been seized from Paul's residence to the diagram of the bomb mailed to the Colusa County Sheriff's Department. He was the farm foreman. provides funeral home, burial, veteran,. This envelope had a postmark from Colusa. PAUL ROGER MOORE, Defendant and Appellant. "That's why I took the case.". Later, as a father, Paul taught Gunner how to hard-wire electronics to his car battery so he would not have to use the cigarette lighter to power the electronics in his car. A jury convicted defendant Paul Roger Moore of first degree murder based exclusively on circumstantial evidence that he built and planted a victim-activated bomb in an irrigation pump he knew the farm foreman and eventual victim, Roberto Ayala, would activate. He also testified that Paul had told him that Roberto had said he was only good for picking up trash and that Roberto would be receiving Peter's inheritance. He had been angry and upset with the Moore family since he was 12 years old. They want the brother, but it is now driven by some young guy, or do they want the young guy? The jurors had the opportunity to observe Paul throughout the trial and to assess Peter's credibility throughout his lengthy direct and cross-examinations. His trial lawyer provided excellent representation and advocacy. Rainfall near a quarter of an inch. The jury was well acquainted with the wiretapping evidence as well as with Paul's description of his life. Rain. But 12 jurors of Pauls peers found that the circumstantial evidence proved beyond a reasonable doubt that he murdered Roberto Ayala, and we must respect their verdict., The appeals court also said that Paul complained bitterly about his life growing up on the farm and felt mistreated by everyone., The Sun Herald article states that the appeals court said the murder case was a classic whodunit. Like the first letter, the text of the second was made with a label maker and photocopied. They had a warrant and wanted to find more evidence that would tie Moore to Ayala's murder. . Click to reveal He discovered what the prosecution experts had all missedthat the user of Peter's computer had visited a YouTube rat trap video. Lab results will be military-grade powder, black spray-painted epoxy, no DNA. They also found a rat trap and three mouse traps in the pantry and fishing line in his boat. Performance & security by Cloudflare. But abused and ostracized by his father Gus, whom family members called Grumpy, Peter was not allowed to farm and instead spent 21 years earning a living in a landscape business he apparently loathed at times. Taken together, their expert opinions constitute substantial evidence from which the jurors could reasonably infer that Paul was the author of the incriminating letters to the investigators and that it was the author of those letters with the knowledge of the intricacies of the bomb who must have designed, created, and planted it. The boy witnessed the explosion that killed his father. But the determinative question is whether the trial court abused its discretion by finding the risk of prejudice did not substantially outweigh whatever probative value the evidence had. The potential prejudice of admitting the evidence was slight. (People v. Kipp (1998) 18 Cal.4th 349, 369. They asked for the testimony of only one witness to be reread to them. [] [], The bale strikes the nail, and the nail strikes the primer, and this is all happening immediately. During his apprenticeship, Paul worked alongside Roberto. The admissibility of uncharged acts depends upon three principal factors: (1) the materiality of the fact sought to be proved or disproved; (2) the tendency of the uncharged crime to prove or disprove the material fact; and (3) the existence of any rule or policy requiring the exclusion of relevant evidence.' 497, 508.) Find Dr. Moore's phone number, address, hospital affiliations and more.

Dallas Behavioral Healthcare Hospital Closing, Articles P