editor decision started nature rejection

Natureuses a transparent peer review system, where for manuscripts submitted from February 2020 we can publish the reviewer comments to the authors and author rebuttal letters of published original research articles. Wishing you the best of luck on your paper. I have been working in the Scientific Publishing Industry for more than 3 years now. Nature editors will normally honour requests that a paper not be sent to one or two (but no more) competing groups for review. Authors should note that as Nature is an interdisciplinary journal, referees for a paper are chosen for different reasons, for example a technical expert and a person who has a general overview of a field might both referee the same paper. Could you please shed some light on the outcome of your situation? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Journalists have embargoedaccess to papers via the Nature Research press site, and are permitted to show papers to independent specialists a few days in advance of publication, under embargo conditions, solely for the purpose of eliciting comment on the work described. . Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editor's office. A referee might be selected for expertise in only one area, for example to judge if a statistical analysis is appropriate, or if a particular technique that is essential to underpin the conclusion has been undertaken properly. Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. The first thing to do when you get a rejection is to take a deep breath and consider your options. All Articles published in Nature go through at least one round of review, usually two or three, sometimes more. Yes, its appropriate.